When used properly, Codeine is a wonderful drug! I use Robitussin and Codeine to relieve my cough! It actually works better than any OTC cough medicine. I never suffered any of the side effects other than drowsiness, which is really good at night so I don't keep myself or my family members up.
One casual look at the abundance of drug substances that seem to pervade everyday life is all it takes to convince anyone that our world has a drug problem. A big drug problem. Drug substances, whether legal or illicit, prescription or recreational, have become the go-to solution for a host of physical, mental and emotional ills. Unfortunately, the fact that these substances have a tendency to exacerbate existing problems and create a whole new set of problems is not widely known or understood. Many individuals who turn to drugs for help find that they have handed over control of their life to something that rapidly works to destroy it.While various prevention strategies are still the most favored weapons in the war against drug abuse and addiction problems, it is becoming more and more painfully obvious that actions must be taken to help those who have already succumbed to drug abuse and addiction. One such action is a new implantable drug that may make it easier for addicts to quit–by reducing or eliminating their drug cravings.The craving-reducing drug naltrexone has actually been around for about two decades, but only in oral form. The problem with the drug has been that addicts who feel better as a result of taking naltrexone tend to stop taking it, which ultimately results in their relapsing back into drug or alcohol use. It is hoped that an implantable form of naltrexone will remove the compliance factor that prohibits recovering addicts from maintaining their recovery. The drug can be implanted inside the individual’s abdomen during a twenty-minute outpatient procedure. It dissolves slowly over a six to eight month period, blocking the receptors that cause the individual to feel a high or euphoric sensation when taking narcotic drug substances. The question is whether or not this will effectively help people maintain their recovery.The sad truth is that despite appearances, most addicts are desperate to take their lives back from drugs. What they lack is the means by which to do so. They may state that they can quit whenever they want, but the truth is that once they become psychologically dependent upon drug substances, their own choices and decisions have very little to do with whether they will actually successfully recover. There is no doubt that their desire to quit their drug use as well as their willingness to persist through all obstacles to full recovery is critical, but they most definitely will need help and support from others in order to make it. Some believe that an implantable form of naltrexone may offer much of this help and support.Dr. George Fallieras of Start Fresh Recovery says that patients receive a very low but effective dose of naltrexone in order to help them eliminate the compulsive cravings they have to use drugs or alcohol. Recovering addicts who have taken naltrexone have stated that they feel as though this overwhelming urge to constantly obtain and use more drug substances is suddenly gone, as if someone turned off a switch. This then opens the door to further recovery–allowing the individual to focus their attention on the counseling and treatment they need in order to get to the root of their drug use problems and resolve the many damaging effects of drug use.While implantable naltrexone may seem to be highly beneficial in treating addiction, there are some things one must consider. First of all, naltrexone is, itself, a drug substance. This means that it too is interrupting the normal functions of the human body and has the potential to create damaging side effects. Because of this, an individual who is considering using naltrexone in order to aid their recovery should truly consider all their options in order to determine whether this is the best one possible.
Dr. George Fallieras of Start Fresh Recovery says that patients receive a very low but effective dose of naltrexone in order to help them eliminate the compulsive cravings they have to use drugs or alcohol. Recovering addicts who have taken naltrexone have stated that they feel as though this overwhelming urge to constantly obtain and use more drug substances is suddenly gone, as if someone turned off a switch. This then opens the door to further recovery–allowing the individual to focus their attention on the counseling and treatment they need in order to get to the root of their drug use problems and resolve the many damaging effects of drug use.
Maté talks about the various addictions to drugs such as heroin, cocaine, methamphetamines and others throughout his video, however where I agree most with him is when he discusses the need for the substance use and abuse and what can happen as a result....
The sad truth is that despite appearances, most addicts are desperate to take their lives back from drugs. What they lack is the means by which to do so. They may state that they can quit whenever they want, but the truth is that once they become psychologically dependent upon drug substances, their own choices and decisions have very little to do with whether they will actually successfully recover. There is no doubt that their desire to quit their drug use as well as their willingness to persist through all obstacles to full recovery is critical, but they most definitely will need help and support from others in order to make it. Some believe that an implantable form of naltrexone may offer much of this help and support.
The focus of this paper will be about Joe, whose substance addiction was the presenting problem, yet the severity of his illness was confounded by a vast array of co-existing trauma, loss, mental illness and sexual addiction....
In recent times, many researches have been conducting on therapy and treatment options available for people who are substance (drugs and alcohol) abusers, and these have come a long way from the older treatment options (e.g. Glasscote et al, 1972). These observations have led the researchers to believe that drug addiction and alcoholism are not just primarily a physical ailment but it is also complemented heavily by environmental factors. Alcoholics and drug abusers tend to follow a specific pattern and we find that many of the people who have alcoholic tendencies come from their genetic makeup (Crabbe, 2002). Yet, even though there are some genetic influences that come into play, the abuse is fed by the abuser's immediate environmental factors, such as the attitudes of the family, friends, and support groups. The genetic side of this ailment explains how there are metabolic, structural, and neuro-chemical malfunctions in the brain that causes a person to become addicted to the drugs, which are supplemented by the environmental factors such as the various home, psychological, and social dynamics that the person experiences in his or her life. These two factors are bi-directional, which means that they both interact and conflict with each other in making the symptoms of alcoholism stronger in a person.
This article explores the developing relationship between neuroscientific understandings of ‘addiction’ and ‘youth’. Drawing on science and technology studies theory and social scientific analyses of both these concepts, it identifies a co-constitutive relationship between notions of addiction as a brain disease and of youth as a stage of brain development. These two concepts are then tracked in a series of drug education documents concerned with alcohol and other drug (AOD) use and addiction among young people, and their implications and effects and analysed together. The aim is to investigate the impact on drug education of neuroscientific approaches to youth and addiction. Are new concepts and directions for harm reduction created in the encounters between neuroscience, youth and addiction, or do they simply reinstate and reinforce existing assumptions and judgments? Is drug education shaped by these concepts likely to achieve its aim, that is, to increase young people’s sensitivity to harm and safety? The article begins by introducing neuroscientific accounts of youth and addiction, arguing that the two concepts share three key assumptions. First, both emphasise biology and sideline social context in the making of drug use practices and outcomes. Second, both reproduce uncritical treatments of brain scans (PET and fMRI images) as windows into minds and subjects. Third, both understand the brain as ontologically separate from its environment. These assumptions and their implications are then tracked through an analysis of Australian drug education resources, focusing on how drug education constitutes youthfulness and addiction as pathological disorders. In its reliance on neuroscientific understandings of youth and addiction, we conclude, drug education is unlikely to achieve its goal of reducing drug-related harm.
The surprising thins is that this is means that the next time you see an alcoholic or a person who is a drug abuser, be sure to think that it is not his or her fault that he is one but he or she has been driven to substance abuse because of either genetic or environmental conditions. Drugs have been a part of our society for many years now. Drugs, other than those used for medicinal purposes, are generally looked down upon and their use is discouraged amongst the people for various reasons. Drugs are considered to be harmful to our health and countless people die every year because of drug abuse. Many definitions exist for the use of 'drug abuse' and all of them relate to the use, misuse, or overuse of drugs for effects that are not therapeutic or medical in nature. Alcohol, cannabis, caffeine, amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, nicotine, opium alkaloids, and tranquilizers are some of the most commonly abused drugs. Almost all the countries in the world consider drugs as illegal and the use of drugs can result in criminal penalty, aside from the other more prominent physical and psychological harm (Mosby 2002). This is because the use of illegal drugs can be very dangerous for the persons using, or rather abusing them, and thus, illegal drugs should remain illegal and never be legalized.
In the past few years, the practitioners in the health care and medicare services have tried to view the instances of drug abuse in a much brighter and broader light. The view of drug abuse is changing from being simply the problem of an individual and is being considered as a problem that plagues the society and the culture. Many of the public health professionals are using the terminology of drugs and alcohol 'problems' instead of 'abuse.' Drugs are also being termed as being harmful and problematic. It has been noted that many of the newspapers and the shows on television present drugs and drug abuse as an ambiguous and catchall phrase, when it is strictly a medical and legal term. Many of the television shows and films are reported to have used this phrase in order to describe any drug use at all, especially the use of drugs that are illicit. On the other hand, “in the modern medical profession, the two most used diagnostic tools in the world, the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) and the World Health Organization's International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD), no longer recognize 'drug abuse' as a current medical diagnosis. Instead, they have adopted substance abuse as a blanket term to include drug abuse and other things. However, other definitions differ; they may entail psychological or physical dependence, and may focus on treatment and prevention in terms of the social consequences of substance use” (Wikipedia).